Population & Samples

Gathering and analyzing samples instead of the entire population is often the most practical and cost effective way to make inferences about an entire population. 

Population and a SampleSix-Sigma-Material.com

There are various techniques for gathering samples and these should be understood by a Six Sigma project manager. 

When there is an attempt to measure across the entire population, then this is referred to as census. But this can be costly, destructive, and time consuming.

There are several methods of sampling. It is important to choose the best plan to provide the best output of information about the entire population. A few common methods are listed below and explained further down the page.

Often when sample sizes are large enough, the Central Limit Theorem applies opening up the use a several simple parametric hypothesis tests for statistical analysis in the ANALYZE phase.

The size of the sample must be decided on by the Six Sigma Project Manager based on the allowable alpha and beta-risks (statistical significance) and the magnitude of shift that you need to observe for a change of practical significance.

As the sample size increases, the estimate of the true population parameter gets stronger and can more reliably detect smaller differences. This seems logical, the closer you get to analyzing all the population, the more accurate your inferences should be about that population

It's important for the GB/BB to get the proper amount and representation of samples to understand the power of the test, ensure the assumptions are met, analyze normality, but yet minimize resources and destruction of parts.

Sampling Plans are typically chosen by their:

  1. Known Risks
  2. Validity
  3. Applicability

1) Random (probability) Sampling Methods

  • Simple Random Sampling
  • Stratified Sampling
  • Sequential Sampling
  • Cluster Sampling
  • If you were trying to evaluate the average length of every rainbow trout in the freshwater lakes of Minnesota, it would not be practical or affordable. A sampling plan would be devised to gather a some of the trout and study them. From this, references to the population with specified levels of confidence can be done. 

    2) Nonrandom (nonprobability) Sampling

  • Judgement Sampling (aka Purposive Sampling)
  • Quota Sample
  • Convenience Sampling
  • Snowball Sampling (aka Referral Sampling)
  • Nonrandom techniques are not preferred due to the additional risk of sampling error introduced. The error can not be calculated and these results are not preferred to infer about the population from with the sample was selected. Therefore, we will not discuss them further within this website.




    Samples - Short and Long Term

    Short Term samples versus a Long Term Sample

    "N" and "n-1"

    The denominator in the standard deviation for a population is N, the denominator for a sample is n-1. The "n-1" is an unbiasing factor and as the sample size approaches infinity, the value of "n-1" approaches "N".

    Understand the results of the statistical program or calculator being used.

    The difference between long term and short term samples



    Statistical Notations

    Population and Sample Notation in statisticsSix-Sigma-Material.com


    Descriptive measures that describe a POPULATION are called PARAMETERS and are usually denoted with Greek letters. A population parameter is the true value of a population attribute. 

    Descriptive measures that describe a SAMPLE are called STATISTICS. A sample statistic is an estimate (based on the sampled data) of a population. Therefore, the sampling method is critical to infer the most accurate information about a population.

    The quality of a sample statistic is strongly affected by how the data is gathered and how well it represents (accuracy and precision) the population. 



    Random Sampling Methods

    The word 'random' means that theoretically requires that every item (part) has the same chance of being chosen (i.e. each item in a lot has an equal chance of being selected).

    Sampling plans for inspections and auditing are typically selected as a function of their known risks, validity, and applicability. 

    Listed below are a few sampling methods. Not mentioned is "discovery sampling" which is most often used in auditing. 

    Simple Random Sampling

    Select this plan if every sample in the population has an equal chance of being selected and there are no subgroups known within the population. The picture below assumes a samples (x’s) are equal and that selecting any of them (a sampling) from the entire population will represent and behave similar to the rest of the population.

    • the population consists of "N" items.
    • a sample consists of "n" items.
    • and all possible samples have equal chance of being selected.

    One example of this method is picking names out of a hat. If all the names are in a hat on the exact same medium (none are heavier, bigger, etc.) and each name is entered the same amount of times then each name has the same chance of being selected. This is analogous to the lottery approach

    Random Sample



    Stratified Sampling

    Dividing the population into subgroups of interest and sampling either sequentially or randomly within each subgroup. This is important to make sure there is representation from all stratifications in the population.

    Stratified sampling is recommended if a population (such as a mixture) is though to be non homogeneous or has possible separation. 

    A subgroup may be data taken at certain temperature range, specific shift, under certain pressure, different machine groups, slower speed versus higher speed, and other different conditions.



    Sequential Sampling

    Acquiring data at specified intervals such as every hour, every 5th form, or on a particular shift. Ensure the interval does not introduce a pattern that may be biased to a specific person, machine, or part each time the data point is collected.

    Sequential sampling and Discovery sampling are commonly used in auditing. 



    Cluster Sampling

    This type of sampling is done when the population is divided into clusters or groups. For there specific clusters are randomly selected for sampling. A 'cluster' may be region, height range, age range, gender, affiliation, machine type, form type, operator skill level, etc. 

    SUMMARY: 

    An appropriate and disciplined plan needs to be clearly understood by those collecting the data. Since the collection process can be expensive and time consuming there may be bias introduced by people making educated guesses, predictions of data, and collecting data that is convenient and simple.

    There are also guidelines for the quantity of samples needed for various types of data. The more data you can obtain the more likely it will represent the performance of the entire population (long-term performance of the process).

    When describing and presenting the data, inform the audience and record the method used to collect the data on the Data Collection Plan.



    Type of bias found in sampling

    A goal of the Six Sigma project manager is to recognize potential bias in the data (or responses) and prevent it from coming into play if possible. Forms of bias that can be introduced into the sampling strategy are:

    • Convenience bias: Often found when time or money is serious constraint and sampling only done when it is convenient. 
    • Non response bias: When a response is needed according to the sampling strategy but the response is incomplete or not provided at all. 
    • Response bias: Occurs when response is misleading, inaccurate or untruthful. occurs when the responder feels pressure that occurs during data collection and influences the response (i.e. social pressure to be accepted and avoid conflict). 
    • Voluntary Response bias: when sample members are self-selected volunteers or when the responders (often people) can choose whether to participate. The resulting sample tends to overrepresent individuals who have strong opinions.

    .


    Return to the DEFINE phase

    Return to the MEASURE phase

    Templates, Tables, and Calculators

    Return to the Six-Sigma-Material Home Page


    Recent Articles

    1. Process Capability Indices

      Oct 18, 21 09:32 AM

      Determing the process capability indices, Pp, Ppk, Cp, Cpk, Cpm

      Read More

    2. Six Sigma Calculator, Statistics Tables, and Six Sigma Templates

      Sep 14, 21 09:19 AM

      Six Sigma Calculators, Statistics Tables, and Six Sigma Templates to make your job easier as a Six Sigma Project Manager

      Read More

    3. Six Sigma Templates, Statistics Tables, and Six Sigma Calculators

      Aug 16, 21 01:25 PM

      Six Sigma Templates, Tables, and Calculators. MTBF, MTTR, A3, EOQ, 5S, 5 WHY, DPMO, FMEA, SIPOC, RTY, DMAIC Contract, OEE, Value Stream Map, Pugh Matrix

      Read More


    Site Membership
    Click for a Password
    to access entire site
    


    Six Sigma
    Templates & Calculators


    Six Sigma Certifications

    Six Sigma Black Belt Certification

    Six Sigma Modules

    The following are available 

    Click Here

    Green Belt Program (1,000+ Slides)

    Basic Statistics

    Cost of Quality

    SPC

    Process Mapping

    Capability Studies

    MSA

    Cause & Effect Matrix

    FMEA

    Multivariate Analysis

    Central Limit Theorem

    Confidence Intervals

    Hypothesis Testing

    T Tests

    1-Way ANOVA

    Chi-Square

    Correlation and Regression

    Control Plan

    Kaizen

    MTBF and MTTR

    Project Pitfalls

    Error Proofing

    Effective Meetings

    OEE

    Takt Time

    Line Balancing

    Practice Exam

    ... and more