Project Management Team Tools

Executing a Six Sigma project involves more than technical knowledge. A Project Manager must be able to lead a team, remove obstacles, recognize emotional needs, deal with adversity, and other human elements. 

The tools shown below are used depending on the situation within your project. Like many tools in your Six Sigma toolbox, not all of them will be used and do not force the use of a tool if not necessary. 

The tools are briefly described below and are likely to be covered in some manner on a Six Sigma certification exam, especially for Black Belts. 

Stakeholder Analysis

The Stakeholder Analysis is a chart which gauges the positioning of stakeholders relative to change and commitment to the goals of the team. 

Projects involve change and this often stirs emotions and encounters resistance. The higher the impact of the projected change the more important this tool becomes. The output of the Stakeholder Analysis is a representation of where the impacted people both inside and outside the system stand relative to change.

A sample template is shown below. Click here to learn more.

Multivoting

Multivoting technique is a decision-making tool to help the team to narrow down or choose from a long list of options.

After a brainstorming exercise, there may be hundreds of ideas. Tools like the Affinity Diagram or Fishbone may be used to organize the ideas to make them clearer to the team before using Multivoting.

Th team leader decides how many ideas will be allowed to survive at the end.

For example, if the list starts at 50, the leader may say that only 10 will be selected. Then after that, if it is still too many, another vote may take place to narrow it down further. 

Each person voting will rank the ideas in order of their preferred priority. The highest priority in their opinion is given the highest ranking.

Using this example, each person gets to select 10 ideas and prioritize them, 10 is the score assigned to the highest priority idea and 1 for the lowest. 

The votes are gathered anonymously and recorded by the team leader on a shareable board. 

Usually, a lot of discussion takes place after the scores are summed for each idea. This discussion can shed light on information some people did or did not know before. This may lead to the need for another vote and further narrow the ideas. 

Multivoting is different than straight voting since an idea may not be the top choice of anyone, but it may get a lot of high scores and rise to the top of the overall list. 

This tool is sort of like a Prioritization Matrix but done more anonymously with less objectivity. The Prioritization Matrix will likely take longer but provide more numerical evidence to support the final result. 

Force Field Analysis

At its core this is a root cause analysis tool that can help you take action once the root cause has been identified.

A current "situation", or the current method, is the result of forces for and against the current state being in equilibrium. In order to make a change, the forces need to change and create a new equilibrium.  

This concept is credited to social psychologist Kurt Lewin. The tool helps identify and prioritize when and where to act to achieve a change.

The analysis includes creating a map of the forces helping and hindering the change, and then prioritizing those forces so the change can be most effectively achieved. 

Force field analysis is a map of the forces (pros & cons) driving or restraining the change. With open dialogue about the pros and cons (positive and negative forces), it becomes more apparent which forces should be prioritized to act upon to create the change. 

The idea is to strengthen the driving forces to enable the change and reduce the forces holding back the change. 

Nominal Group Technique

The word "nominal" is used in the name of this tool since the intent is to restrict communications to remove peer pressure in influencing the flow of ideas and creativity. The last thing a team wants is an "influencer" and steer the others in a direction than may dampen the true ideas from the other members of the team.

This tool is useful when a team is developing and prioritizing ideas that include controversial, or sensitive, issues. 

As the GB/BB, you may be the facilitator of this 60-90 minute process. Be sure to remove your own bias.

1. Before any open dialogue, the facilitator explains the problem to the team.
2. The members independent and silently record their ideas.
3. The facilitator goes around to each member and ask for one idea at a time and records them. No discussion is allowed at this point
4. After all ideas are recorded, the facilitator leads the discussion and valuation of the ideas. The pros and cons of each idea are discussed. Some ideas may be combined. 
5. Voting is done and often done in a manner where others can't see each others votes. 

Groupthink

A Six Sigma team leader may be an expert on statistics and using the related tools but before that is often an exercise of subjective root cause analysis. This involves open dialogue, often controversial, and uncomfortable discussions. The hard truth can be tough to uncover.

A fundamental breakthrough (which is often needed to achieve "Six Sigma" performance) often means upsetting the equilibrium and doing things drastically different. That's likely to ruffle some feathers in the organization. 

Leaders should be aware of the Groupthink psychological phenomenon. Some participants on the team may be reluctant to share their beliefs and debate for their opinion if it seems to be going against the rest of the crowd or a vocal, or respected participant with a different opinion. 

This influences the ability for the leader to get all the information that others, and the leaders, may benefit from knowing. As a Project Manager it's important to try and recognize if this is happening and possibly seek an anonymous method to getting this information out of everyone. 

Go to DMAIC

Six Sigma / Lean Practice Exam

Six Sigma Jobs

Templates, Tables, and Calculators