Common project pitfalls to avoid before and during a Six Sigma project.
The project extended beyond the original defined parameters and became unmanageable. Teams will get ambitious and seek perfection. They may try to tackle everything at once. Set a manageable scope, achieve the goals, celebrate it, close it out and write a new contract if needed to get the next level towards perfection. Stick to the scope defined in the project contract.
Most GB's and BB's seek to impress especially if it is their first project. As a result hard and soft savings are sometimes over estimated or projected to start earlier than possible. More projects are focused on soft savings such as items that are difficult to quantify and difficult to be perceived as improved by the company and upper management. Examples are customer quality, any type of risk reductions, delivery improvements, improved customer loyalty.
This is probably one of the leading inputs that results in a diminishing GB/BB reputation as well as the company's program itself. To prevent premature savings commitments or erroneous commitments companies should clearly define the policies and procedures to calculate hard and soft savings. The best advice for a GB/BB is to have a finance professional validate projected savings and actual savings as they occur during and after a project is closed.
There may have been a previous company problem that went unresolved or a problem that is well beyond a team's jurisdiction. It has resurfaced with the thought that a Six Sigma team can automatically fix it. The project is destined for failure before it starts. The credibility of both the GB/BB and the company's Six Sigma program are compromised.
Lack of Support
It starts with Upper Management, then the Champion, Green Belt, or Black Belt. The Champion has the delicate role of ensuring support without getting overly involved in team activity. Lack of support means failing to provide time, people, equipment, money, or leadership.
Upper Management must walk the talk; actions will speak louder than words. The culture required for Six Sigma to succeed can not be faked, it needs to be in the values of the leadership team and embraced within everything they do.
The project needs to invoke interest and show correlation to the team members' needs. Use a Stakeholder Analysis tool early and throughout the project to determine the team assessment.
The last phase of a DMAIC project is often rushed in order to close a project and get someone credit. This leads to a process/service change that has not been controlled and eventually any measured improvement will unwind. This will also damage the credibility of the GB/BB, the team members, and the Six Sigma program.
Sustaining the gains of any project whether it is at home or work is the most challenging and often most underestimated.
The project does not require the problem solving methodology. Some problems can clearly be answered, or are low hanging fruit that just need to be resolved.
Paralysis from Analysis
This term is used for those project managers that love to display numbers and proceed solely on data. Sometimes this takes away from the team's expertise and input to provide the hidden factory elements. Team participants take pride in sharing their knowledge. Moreover, some of the tools are subjective so allow them to relay their valuable information to you and the rest of them members.
Crunching numbers, data cleansing, looking for the perfect MSA, and running statistical tests are potential traps to stall projects. Guiding the team through data analysis is preferred but don't overdo it or let it interfere with momentum. The project isn't about YOU so impressing the team with charts and figures isn't a priority.
People don't care about how much you know until they know how much you care...about them. Focus on them as individuals and they will listen to your message, and your data, more effectively.
Un-Qualified Green Belt/Black Belt
Companies invest a lot of resources into developing Lean and Six Sigma leaders and expect them to quickly deliver results to the bottom line. Six Sigma is not for everyone, some will not suit the role and some will not grasp the material.
Others will become subject matter experts but fail to have the people skills and "change" vigor needed to achieve breakthroughs and paradigm shifts. Every project requires a qualified manager and the tools within this site can help but experience is the most valuable.
It is also important for the GB/BB selection process from Upper Management to be robust and for the individuals that are selected to take it upon themselves to be aggressive, learn, network, and apply the work.
Software Glitch - operator failure
As a Six Sigma Project Manager, there will be a lot of time spent within a statistical software program and likely Excel. Do your homework in advance and learn the basic functions of organizing data, looking for errors, creating Pareto Diagrams, checking normality, and basic functions that you will use over and over. You can make up random data if necessary.
Go through the menus, options, and READ the help menu. First, learn how to make the most of it. This is also an excellent way to learn about statistics. You will probably find yourself pausing to absorb some of the material along the way.
But don't get too carried away and suffer from another earlier pitfall...Paralysis from Analysis.
There is no "I" in "TEAM"
Learn about your team members, their history, work background, and be sensitive to their personal side. Try to understand their hot buttons and also what motivates them. From this, crafting messages and delivering elevator speeches can become more valuable.
Give credit to the TEAM and individuals (with care not to make others feel slighted).
Some projects simply needed to be discovered and solution is already known. These are usual;y very small in scope and are projects to just go and execute - don't waste time trying to shoehorn it into a drawn out project tying up resources.
The following criteria generally constitute a good DMAIC Six Sigma project:
1) Problem exist with no clear solution
2) Root causes not fully understood
3) Opportunity to improve customer satisfaction
4) Material cost savings as defined by company
5) Aligns with company goals, mission, and vision
6) Complexity in the process
7) Data is available or reasonable to obtain
8) There must be an existing process
9) If a BB project, generally needs to be achievable in 3-6 months
10) If a GB project, generally needs to be achievable in 1-3 months
Find more material on Project Management
Proceed to module on Project Management
Templates and Calculators
Test your skills with sample certification problems
Return to the Six-Sigma-Material Home Page
Six Sigma Modules
The following presentations are available to download
Green Belt Program 1,000+ Slides
Cause & Effect Matrix
Central Limit Theorem
1-Way Anova Test
Correlation and Regression
Six Sigma & Lean Courses